Tag Archives: operation cross fire

Obama gate

What is Obama Gate?

Today on May 11th, 2020 I awoke to an explosion of Twitter feed #Obamagate

I am slowly building this and might post it before it is completed. BLOG WORK IN PROGRESS. This event is rapidly unfolding, each day I add to this more information comes out. The point of this post is to post a summary of ObamaGate along with my thoughts, bringing in rare knowledge to you that I have been digging for! All of my comments are with a Drop Cap, the first letter is Big .

We want to show the people facts on why the world is talking about Obama Gate.

Obama was all in favor of a peaceful transition of power. Behind the scenes he was plotting some bad things, as is still coming to light about this entire dark part of history. When they say “drain the swamp”, what are they talking about? Things are corrupt and it goes deep.

WATCH THE VIDEO – Obama Transition of Power 2016

We see Obama talking about the transfer of power from his administration to the next.

What we found out was another plot.

What is this guy talking about?

Proof is coming?

I woke up to over 3.36 Million Tweets ! Huh ???

8th Trending topic in the world !

What exactly is OBAMA GATE?

It is a reference from Water Gate, from the Richard Nixon Administration.

We all know our history right?

This almost happened to Trump. However our 45th President did not leave his office, he was exonerated.

Who is Michael Flynn?

Biggest Abuse of Power Scandal in American History

Part 1

Part 2

The Aftermath Witch Hunt

President Donald Trump is acquitted for life!

The Democrats’ impeachment witch hunt has finally come to a close. Here’s the disgraceful sham by the numbers:

  • 134 wasted days not working for the American people.
  • 119 Democrats who supported impeachment before the whistleblower complaint became public.
  • 17 Democrat witnesses called.
  • 0 Republican witnesses called.
  • 3 silver platters Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) used to present celebratory pens for the “solemn” signing ceremony.
  • 33 days Speaker Nancy Pelosi held the extremely “urgent” articles of impeachment.
  • 63 million votes Democrats tried to invalidate due to their hatred of the man in the White House.

The impeachment political hit job lacked due process or fairness for the president, breaking all historical precedent. The Democrats’ unfounded case met its final fate in the Senate where it came crashing down due to lack of facts, evidence, or truth. The White House Defense Team obliterated the sham orchestrated by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Co. bit by bit.

No quid pro quo. No pressure. No impeachable offense.

Now, this unconstitutional impeachment expedition is the Democrats’ legacy. They are responsible for dividing our country and taking us down a long, hard road of impeachment solely because it’s what their radical base demanded. It’s been the goal since Jan. 20, 2017 when they saw President Trump step foot in the White House, promising to drain the swamp and put America first.

Their legacy of impeachment is all they have to show for their House majority – and the American people will judge them harshly. In the midst of it all, President Trump stood up for America on the world stage and worked to unleash the best economy in the world. He never let the impeachment noise from the swamp stop him.

It’s time to move on now that the Democrats’ efforts to dismiss 63 million Americans have been crushed. The impeachment chapter is closed, and the witch hunt is over.

SOURCE – THE HILL IMPEACHMENT REPORT

I am just a unicorn in the corner web of the internet. A very casual blogger. The following article describes this Operation Cross-fire Hurricane and it looks, sad, and dirty. The only response I hear back is “well he deserved it”. You can please describe how to digest and process all this information. All that tax payer money, elected officials, everything that represents America had some corrupt things going on only recently. Is this why #ObamaGate was blowing up on Twitter ?

OPERATION CROSS-FIRE HURRICANE

SOURCE – THE HILL – OPINION

“Operation Crossfire Hurricane,” the FBI’s code name for its investigation into Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, blew through the United States in 2016 and did more damage to our national security institutions than any real hurricane could. The upcoming report from the Department of Justice’s Inspector General may well conclude that high-level Obama Justice Department and FBI officials knowingly lied to obtain top-secret surveillance warrants that were originally designed to target foreign spies and terrorists, and used them to monitor a U.S. citizen whose only crime appears to have been acting as an adviser to the Trump campaign.  

While lying to a federal court is a crime, lying in the context of using our nation’s most secret — and most constitutionally intrusive — counter-intelligence assets as part of a false narrative to oppose a political candidate is downright dangerous and should strike fear in the average citizen who now is left to wonder what protects them from such seemingly unchecked power of the state. 

It is a very serious matter to obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant. The members of the FISA Court are appointed by the chief justice of the Supreme Court. Each of these federal judges rotates into Washington to sit in the highly-secure courtroom inside the Department of Justice (DOJ) on Pennsylvania Avenue to review and sign FISA applications, which then become formal warrants to surveil national security targets in a variety of classified and unclassified ways. 

THE HILL SOURCE – Link to Entire Article about the Operation

Here is Trump again saying they have done some pretty bad things.

Then you see this article.

The President Declines to Name the Crime

This country has many secrets. You know what I think happened? There is national security, big heavy secrets about things, and you know, somehow Trump got tagged as a threat to our nation that could not imagine an outsider (out of politics) getting into the White House, so he was put on the backside of our spy agency. They put him in as a threat to our nation.

That in a nutshell is what happened. The President can’t tear the layers of the onion too far because of all the other Pandora Boxes around in that basement. Dominos ! The entire thing might come down and collapse, the previous President thought this new President was a threat to our democracy and there you have it.

Declassified docs show Obama knew about Flynn investigation

Will President Obama come out to talk about this?

What will the consequences be of this evidence that has been hidden from the public result in? Will it be swept under the rug? Are we going to have another trial?

I want to add I voted for Obama twice. I was proud to have the first black President serve in the White House. I also knew that the impeachment trial was unfair. When we get to this point in 2020 about ObamaGate, I can only dream of this being properly investigated and to have all the information come out to the American people and we make up our own minds on what really happened.

To: Barack Hussein Obama
From: Sidney Powell
www.SidneyPowell.com

Date: May 13, 2020

Re: Your Failure to Find Precedent for Flynn Dismissal

Regarding the decision of the Department of Justice to dismiss charges against General Flynn, in your recent call with your alumni, you expressed great concern: “there is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic — not just institutional norms — but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk.”

Here is some help—if truth and precedent represent your true concern. Your statement is entirely false. However, it does explain the damage to the Rule of Law throughout your administration.

First, General Flynn was not charged with perjurywhich requires a material false statement made under oath with intent to deceive.1A perjury prosecution would have been appropriate and the Rule of Law applied if the Justice Department prosecuted your former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe for his multiple lies under oath in an investigation of a leak only he knew he caused.

McCabe lied under oath in fully recorded and transcribed interviews with the Inspector General for the DOJ. He was informed of the purpose of the interview, and he had had the benefit of counsel. He knew he was the leaker. McCabe even lied about lying. He lied to his own agents—which sent them on a “wild-goose-chase”—thereby making his lies “material” and an obstruction of justice. Yet, remarkably, Attorney General Barr declined to prosecute McCabe for these offenses.

Applying the Rule of Law, after declining McCabe’s perjury prosecution, required the Justice Department to dismiss the prosecution of General Flynn who was not warned, not under oath, had no counsel, and whose statements were not only not recorded, but were created as false by FBI agents who falsified the 302.

Second, it would seem your “wingman” Eric Holder is missing a step these days at Covington & Burling LLP. Indelibly marked in his memory (and one might think, yours) should be his Motion to Dismiss the multi-count jury verdict of guilty and the entire case against former United States Senator Ted Stevens. Within weeks of Mr. Holder becoming Attorney General, he moved to dismiss the Stevens prosecution in the interest of justice for the same reasons the Justice Department did against General Flynn—egregious misconduct by prosecutors who hid exculpatory evidence and concocted purported crimes.

As horrifying as the facts of the Stevens case were, they pale in comparison to the targeted setup, framing, and prosecution of a newly elected President’s National Security Advisor and the shocking facts that surround it. This case was an assault on the heart of liberty— our cherished system of self-government, the right of citizens to choose their President, and the hallowed peaceful transition of power.

Third, the inability of anyone in your alumni association to find “anybody who has been charged [with anything] just getting off scot-free” would be laughable were it not so pathetic.

Many of your alum feature prominently in the non-fiction legal thriller published in 2014: Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice. A national best- seller, it focusses on the egregious prosecutorial misconduct of your longest serving White House Counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler; your counter-terrorism advisor Lisa Monaco; Loretta Lynch’s DAG for the Criminal Division Leslie Caldwell; and Mueller protégé Andrew Weissmann. While they worked as federal prosecutors on the Enron Task Force—under the purported supervision of Christopher Wray—they destroyed Arthur Andersen LLP and its 85,000 jobs; sent four Merrill Lynch executives to prison on an indictment that criminalized an innocent business transaction while they hid the evidence that showed those defendants were innocent for six years. Both cases were reversed on appeal for their over-criminalization and misconduct. Indeed, Andersen was reversed by a unanimous Supreme Court.

Fourth, even if your many alumni don’t remember multiple cases that had to be reversed or dismissed for their own misconduct, Judge Emmet Sullivan should remember dismissing the corrupted case against Ted Stevens. Judge Sullivan is the judicial hero of Licensed to Lie. It is that case that caused Judge Sullivan to enter the strong Brady order the Mueller and D.C. career prosecutors violated repeatedly in the Flynn prosecution.

Fifth, there is precedent for guilty pleas being vacated. Your alumni Weissmann and Ruemmler are no strangers to such reversals. At least two guilty pleas they coerced by threats against defendants in Houston had to be thrown out—again for reasons like those here. The defendants “got off scot-free” because—like General Flynn—your alumni had concocted the charges and terrorized the defendants into pleading guilty to “offenses” that were not crimes. Andersen partner David Duncan even testified for the government against Andersen in its trial, but his plea had to be vacated. Enron Broadband defendant Christopher Calger had his plea vacated. There are many others across the country.

Sixth, should further edification be necessary, see Why Innocent People Plead Guilty, written in 2014 by federal Judge Jed Rakoff (a Clinton appointee). Abusive prosecutors force innocent people to plead guilty with painful frequency. The Mueller special counsel operation led by Andrew Weissmann and Weissmann “wannabes” specializes in prosecutorial terrorist tactics repulsive to everything “justice” is supposed to mean. These tactics are designed to intimidate their targets into pleading guilty—while punishing them and their families with the process itself and financial ruin.

Most important, General Flynn was honest with the FBI agents. They knew he was—and briefed that to McCabe and others three different times. At McCabe’s directions, Agent Strzok and McCabe’s “Special Counsel” Lisa Page, altered the 302 to create statements Weissmann, Mueller, Van Grack, and Zainab Ahmad could assert were false. Only the FBI agents lied—and falsified documents. The crimes are theirs alone.

Seventh, the D.C. circuit in which you reside vacated a Section 1001 case for a legal failure much less egregious than those in General Flynn’s case. United States v. Safavian, 528 F.3d 957 (D.C. Cir. 2008). Safavian sought advice from his agency’s ethics board and did not give them all the relevant info. The jury convicted him on the theory it was a 1001 violation to conceal the information from the government ethics board. The court disagreed: “As Safavian argues and as the government agrees, there must be a legal duty to disclose in order for there to be a concealment offense in violation of § 1001(a)(1), yet the government failed to identify a legal disclosure duty except by reference to vague standards of conduct for government employees.” General Flynn did not even know he was the subject of an investigation—and in truth, he was not. The only crimes here were by your alumni in the FBI, White House, intelligence community, and Justice Department.

These are just a few obvious and well-known examples to those paying any attention to criminal justice issues.

Finally, the “leaked” comments from your alumni call further evinces your obsession with destroying a distinguished veteran of the United States Army who has defended the Constitution and this country “from all enemies, foreign and domestic,” with the highest honor for thirty-three years. He and many others will continue to do so.